Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lana Hume

Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care Carmel, IN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1932724671 CMS profile 11133994

15229 Westfield Blvd, Carmel, IN 46032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,335

209 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lana Hume of Carmel, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,335 across 209 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $450 25
2024 General $782 42
2023 General $792 47
2022 General $420 25
2021 General $891 70

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lana Hume
  • Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lana Hume were reported at $450. Among 4,814 Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles paid that year, the median was $169 and the middle half received between $51 and $499.

Show as a table
Year Lana Hume Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $891 $137 $39–$445 $132
2022 $420 $139 $44–$421 $149
2023 $792 $163 $53–$481 $160
2024 $782 $176 $54–$511 $164
2025 $450 $169 $51–$499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $782 65 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $521 30 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $314 13 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $285 17 payments
  5. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $151 8 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $136 9 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $134 8 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $118 6 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $116 7 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $104 7 payments
  11. Other $675 39 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,335 209 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Kerendia $314 13 payments
  2. Ozempic $258 16 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $206 11 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $192 12 payments
  5. UBRELVY $182 11 payments
  6. Auvelity $151 8 payments
  7. Wegovy $147 11 payments
  8. Saxenda $137 16 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $134 8 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $117 7 payments
  11. Other $2,126 128 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

252

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$14,338

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

9.1%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 12 $12,532
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 17 $277
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 19 $216
Gabapentin Generic 17 $191
Propranolol Hcl Er Propranolol Hcl Brand 11 $187
Celecoxib Generic 13 $129
Zolpidem Tartrate Generic 13 $124
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 27 $120
Methylprednisolone Generic 21 $115
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 14 $84

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $176
$176 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $102
$102 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $93
$93 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $48
$48 12 —
NEXLETOL
  • Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

209 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record