Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lam Le

Physician Assistant, Surgical Merced, CA Physician Assistant

NPI 1164824066 CMS profile 11111264

388 E Yosemite Ave Ste 100, Merced, CA 95340

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,843

501 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lam Le of Merced, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,843 across 501 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Physician Assistant, Surgical profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,638 154
2024 General $2,739 155
2023 General $1,378 80
2022 General $1,180 50
2021 General $908 62

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lam Le
  • Physician Assistant, Surgical median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant, Surgical
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lam Le were reported at $2,638. Among 8,152 Physician Assistant, Surgical profiles paid that year, the median was $146 and the middle half received between $51 and $385.

Show as a table
Year Lam Le Physician Assistant, Surgical median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $908 $111 $36–$285 $132
2022 $1,180 $126 $44–$350 $149
2023 $1,378 $137 $47–$355 $160
2024 $2,739 $146 $49–$384 $164
2025 $2,638 $146 $51–$385 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,519 102 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,008 33 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $982 48 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $978 67 payments
  5. Incyte Corporation $669 55 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $583 37 payments
  7. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $494 20 payments
  8. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $358 26 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $344 15 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $326 18 payments
  11. Other $1,583 80 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,241 492 payments
  2. Education $602 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $961 63 payments
  2. SKYRIZI Immunology $957 64 payments
  3. TALTZ $931 46 payments
  4. OPZELURA $669 55 payments
  5. VTAMA $519 22 payments
  6. OLUMIANT $422 17 payments
  7. EBGLYSS $347 22 payments
  8. SKYRIZI Immunology $326 21 payments
  9. Zoryve $314 24 payments
  10. SOTYKTU $294 12 payments
  11. Other $4,445 242 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,624

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$311,499

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 12 $165,238
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 15 $53,190
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $48,453
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 213 $9,446
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 323 $4,893
Tacrolimus Generic 27 $4,577
Fluocinonide Generic 54 $3,173
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 62 $2,857
Ketoconazole Generic 206 $2,709
Tretinoin Generic 29 $2,105

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$341,348

Of which drugs: $1,107

Medicare patients

1,341

Average age 75

Services billed

6,910

754 women, 587 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Heart failure 15%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 53 238 $182

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $573
$573 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $388
$388 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $287
$287 12 —
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $190
$190 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $175
$175 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

501 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record