Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kyle Champagne

Internal Medicine Baton Rouge, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1568858082 CMS profile 2780386

8119 Picardy Ave, Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,899

950 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kyle Champagne of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,899 across 950 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,437 198
2024 General $3,428 184
2023 General $2,853 190
2022 General $3,951 248
2021 General $1,980 126
2020 General $13 1
2019 General $237 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kyle Champagne
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kyle Champagne were reported at $3,437. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Kyle Champagne Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $237 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $13 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,980 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,951 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,853 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,428 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,437 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,795 137 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,597 106 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,196 83 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,135 50 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,042 70 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $753 53 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $740 47 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $592 36 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $569 29 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $458 12 payments
  11. Other $6,022 327 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,886 948 payments
  2. Education $13 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MOUNJARO $1,024 62 payments
  2. UBRELVY $809 60 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $780 49 payments
  4. BREZTRI $649 23 payments
  5. FARXIGA $620 24 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $585 46 payments
  7. Kerendia $569 29 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $537 34 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $511 40 payments
  10. Ozempic $510 40 payments
  11. Other $14,851 908 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 115 drugs

Part D claims

5,786

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,052,684

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

32.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 155 $163,894
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 104 $136,717
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 13 $118,632
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 113 $109,500
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 72 $56,829
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 54 $50,279
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 19 $43,098
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 63 $41,638
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 36 $34,445
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 35 $28,666

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 115 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$28,644

Of which drugs: $2,650

Medicare patients

149

Average age 72

Services billed

536

69 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 18%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 19 19 $1,555

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 48 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$223 113 —
MOUNJARO
$201 104 —
VRAYLAR
$188 — —
Otezla
$182 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$168 54 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 48 with Patron

Records

950 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record