Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kurt Lundberg

Pain Medicine Gilbert, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1689930927 CMS profile 31477

3591 S Mercy Rd Ste 204, Ste 113, Gilbert, AZ 85297

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,229

346 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kurt Lundberg of Gilbert, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,229 across 346 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $774 13
2024 General $2,200 41
2023 General $1,610 57
2022 General $2,322 75
2021 General $1,708 108
2020 General $1,209 35
2019 General $1,405 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kurt Lundberg
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kurt Lundberg were reported at $774. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Kurt Lundberg Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,405 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $1,209 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $1,708 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $2,322 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $1,610 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $2,200 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $774 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $6,309 236 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $1,396 16 payments
  3. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $692 50 payments
  4. Nevro Corp. $634 9 payments
  5. Nalu Medical, Inc. $366 6 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $243 5 payments
  7. Medtronic USA, Inc. $236 2 payments
  8. MML US, Inc. $197 1 payment
  9. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $162 7 payments
  10. CoreLink, LLC $148 1 payment
  11. Other $846 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,164 339 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,065 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $2,641 107 payments
  2. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $1,104 26 payments
  3. Proclaim IPG $1,055 76 payments
  4. KYPHON EXPRESS II KYPHOPAK TRAY $729 10 payments
  5. XTAMPZA $678 49 payments
  6. Nalu Neurostimulation System $366 6 payments
  7. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $347 6 payments
  8. INTERSTIM $334 2 payments
  9. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $292 2 payments
  10. Omnia $287 3 payments
  11. Other $3,496 63 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

3,535

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$152,940

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

29.7%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 52 $30,899
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 12 $18,107
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 32 $15,461
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 472 $13,534
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 321 $13,460
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 609 $12,307
Fentanyl Generic 56 $8,338
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 15 $7,832
Gabapentin Generic 466 $7,375
Pregabalin Generic 161 $4,090

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$227,021

Of which drugs: $1,313

Medicare patients

361

Average age 72

Services billed

10,072

235 women, 126 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 24%
Osteoporosis 21%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 128 6,934 $689
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 40 316 $227
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 29 33 $151
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 19 19 $141
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 92 1,190 $105

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $108
$108 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $52
$52 32 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

346 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record