Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kristy Jones

Internal Medicine Rogers, AR Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1770808396 CMS profile 385236

2110 W Walnut, Suite 100, Rogers, AR 72756

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,618

360 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kristy Jones of Rogers, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,618 across 360 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $686 27
2024 General $809 40
2023 General $861 52
2022 General $889 54
2021 General $978 66
2020 General $358 24
2019 General $1,037 97

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kristy Jones
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kristy Jones were reported at $686. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Kristy Jones Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,037 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $358 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $978 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $889 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $861 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $809 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $686 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $626 56 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $624 31 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $509 27 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $480 34 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $453 45 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $406 19 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $362 20 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $356 17 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $345 23 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $161 11 payments
  11. Other $1,297 77 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,618 360 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $501 24 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $490 44 payments
  3. Ozempic $374 17 payments
  4. FreeStyle Libre $326 18 payments
  5. QULIPTA $312 12 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $310 21 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $241 15 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $238 16 payments
  9. Repatha $231 14 payments
  10. Otezla $212 12 payments
  11. Other $4,595 322 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 124 drugs

Part D claims

6,055

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$484,313

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $72,776
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 45 $63,440
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 67 $56,327
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 45 $41,784
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 24 $40,921
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 36 $33,539
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $28,552
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 22 $25,644
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 21 $19,713
Belsomra Suvorexant Brand 17 $10,627

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 124 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,761

Of which drugs: $22,579

Medicare patients

247

Average age 73

Services billed

2,379

164 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Diabetes 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 13 13 $3,779
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 39 39 $3,161

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $83
$83 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $52
$52 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $52
$52 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $51
$51 23 —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

360 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record