Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kristin Austria

Nurse Practitioner Virginia Beach, VA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1750893434 CMS profile 11013804

225 Clearfield Ave, Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,616

254 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kristin Austria of Virginia Beach, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,616 across 254 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,474 48
2024 General $7,193 63
2023 General $8,230 90
2022 General $1,447 44
2021 General $2,272 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kristin Austria
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kristin Austria were reported at $6,474. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Kristin Austria Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $2,272 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,447 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $8,230 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $7,193 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $6,474 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $19,497 52 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $2,073 4 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $1,370 24 payments
  4. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $749 60 payments
  5. Coloplast Corp $517 52 payments
  6. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. $346 17 payments
  7. C. R. Bard, Inc. & Subsidiaries $319 19 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $237 3 payments
  9. Urovant Sciences Inc $131 16 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $118 2 payments
  11. Other $258 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12,766 15 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $8,418 17 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $3,397 216 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $670 1 payment
  5. Education $364 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. BOTOX Urology $20,537 31 payments
  2. INTERSTIM $1,308 18 payments
  3. GEMTESA $881 76 payments
  4. BOTOX Facial Aesthetics $670 1 payment
  5. SpeediCath $517 52 payments
  6. XIAFLEX $346 17 payments
  7. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $325 21 payments
  8. Bard Urinary Drainage Bag $297 18 payments
  9. AVEED $169 11 payments
  10. XTANDI $118 2 payments
  11. Other $596 19 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

2,261

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$708,369

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

46.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 387 $374,352
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 235 $203,506
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 33 $26,965
Trospium Chloride Generic 243 $26,340
Estradiol Generic 274 $19,740
Trospium Chloride Er Trospium Chloride Brand 75 $16,287
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 28 $13,018
Darifenacin Er Darifenacin Hydrobromide Brand 69 $8,658
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 231 $3,519
Trimethoprim Generic 49 $2,526

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$167,480

Of which drugs: $28,110

Medicare patients

853

Average age 76

Services billed

10,623

626 women, 227 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Diabetes 39%
Depression 38%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Osteoporosis 24%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 33 5,800 $28,106

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $6,666
$6,666 — 5,800
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $167
$167 387 —
XTANDI
  • PFIZER INC. $6
$6 — —
ORGOVYX
  • PFIZER INC. $6
$6 — —
TALZENNA
  • PFIZER INC. $6
$6 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

254 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record