Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kristi Glanzer

Nurse Practitioner Huron, SD Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1245232008 CMS profile 10836895

111 4Th St Se, Huron, SD 57350

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,215

452 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kristi Glanzer of Huron, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,215 across 452 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,033 69
2024 General $1,316 77
2023 General $1,127 84
2022 General $1,180 97
2021 General $1,559 125

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kristi Glanzer
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kristi Glanzer were reported at $1,033. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Kristi Glanzer Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,559 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,180 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,127 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,316 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,033 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $870 72 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $703 60 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $579 52 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $470 41 payments
  5. Grifols USA, LLC $389 20 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $353 23 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $333 28 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $309 11 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $309 22 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $291 16 payments
  11. Other $1,610 107 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,109 449 payments
  2. Education $107 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $556 49 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $539 48 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $485 32 payments
  4. Prolastin-C Liquid $389 20 payments
  5. XARELTO $333 28 payments
  6. UBRELVY $327 20 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $317 32 payments
  8. FARXIGA $279 8 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $272 27 payments
  10. EVENITY $271 24 payments
  11. Other $5,550 410 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 146 drugs

Part D claims

9,694

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$807,195

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 163 $173,328
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 103 $109,535
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 77 $74,587
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 70 $56,441
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 55 $54,285
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 64 $52,134
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 47 $37,708
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 41 $33,614
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 16 $22,094
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 13 $18,740

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 146 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 120 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$256,381

Of which drugs: $121,237

Medicare patients

309

Average age 71

Services billed

12,007

189 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Arthritis 31%
Diabetes 27%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Osteoporosis 18%
Cancer 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 36 3,720 $75,744
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 75 75 $21,777
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 83 83 $1,796
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 26 160 $121

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $108
  • Lilly USA, LLC $24
$132 70 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $114
$114 163 —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $62
$62 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $61
$61 64 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $56
$56 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

452 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in South Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record