Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kristen Aguirre

Dermatology Oceanside, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1205255288 CMS profile 2847447

3629 Vista Way, Oceanside, CA 92056

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,142

275 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,727

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$82,455 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Kristen Aguirre of Oceanside, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,142 across 275 general payments and $1,727 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $82,455 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,080 37
2024 General $1,633 70
2023 General $1,204 42
2022 General $893 34
2021 General $1,102 46
2020 General $312 11
2020 Research $1,727 1
2019 General $5,919 35

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kristen Aguirre
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kristen Aguirre were reported at $1,080. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Kristen Aguirre Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,919 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $312 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,102 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $893 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,204 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,633 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,080 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biofrontera Inc. $5,339 14 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $762 42 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $670 25 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $587 14 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $577 17 payments
  6. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $562 13 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $493 25 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $486 22 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $342 13 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $248 7 payments
  11. Other $2,076 83 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,656 267 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,000 2 payments
  3. Education $467 5 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ameluz $5,231 8 payments
  2. BF-RhodoLED $5,231 8 payments
  3. XEPI $3,781 9 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $768 22 payments
  5. TALTZ $628 23 payments
  6. TREMFYA $600 13 payments
  7. ADBRY $452 23 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $450 31 payments
  9. EUCRISA $441 20 payments
  10. OLUMIANT $261 10 payments
  11. Other $3,850 159 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LEO Pharma AS $1,727 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

728

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$73,064

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

7.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 14 $52,389
Fluorouracil Generic 94 $4,928
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 49 $2,440
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 39 $2,255
Fluocinonide Generic 52 $2,195
Metronidazole Generic 29 $1,670
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 20 $1,178
Ketoconazole Generic 78 $1,050
Minoxidil Generic 100 $928
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 25 $774

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 71 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$147,725

Of which drugs: $9,332

Medicare patients

363

Average age 75

Services billed

2,976

281 women, 82 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 44%
Osteoporosis 21%
Depression 19%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Diabetes 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Chronic kidney disease 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 27 30 $9,306

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $286
$286 14 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $251
$251 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $199
$199 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $189
$189 — —
ADBRY
  • LEO Pharma Inc. $142
$142 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

276 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record