Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Keya Kuhn

Internal Medicine Saint Louis, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1396908513 CMS profile 153738

621 S New Ballas Rd Ste 189A, Saint Louis, MO 63141

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,448

502 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Keya Kuhn of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,448 across 502 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,582 87
2024 General $1,726 94
2023 General $2,092 122
2022 General $1,606 104
2021 General $502 29
2020 General $204 13
2019 General $736 53

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Keya Kuhn
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Keya Kuhn were reported at $1,582. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Keya Kuhn Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $736 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $204 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $502 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,606 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,092 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,726 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,582 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,427 82 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,027 61 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $959 66 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $804 56 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $551 30 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $546 28 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $473 28 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $242 12 payments
  9. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $202 14 payments
  10. Medtronic, Inc. $172 7 payments
  11. Other $2,044 118 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,448 502 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $687 45 payments
  2. Ozempic $516 30 payments
  3. QULIPTA $507 28 payments
  4. AREXVY $472 32 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $457 27 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $415 30 payments
  7. UBRELVY $405 25 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $403 22 payments
  9. SHINGRIX $337 23 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $335 17 payments
  11. Other $7,044 411 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 112 drugs

Part D claims

5,750

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$259,200

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 60 $72,509
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 63 $57,801
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 19 $16,367
Arexvy Rsvpref3 Antigen/As01e/Pf Brand 64 $15,432
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 23 $6,998
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 12 $6,340
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 12 $4,509
Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 17 $4,181
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 575 $4,015
Gabapentin Generic 146 $4,014

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 112 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$50,802

Of which drugs: $5,167

Medicare patients

197

Average age 72

Services billed

632

165 women, 32 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 47%
Depression 35%
Osteoporosis 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Cancer 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 23 23 $1,872

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AREXVY
$135 64 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$132 19 —
ELIQUIS
$104 63 —
MOUNJARO
$88 — —
VRAYLAR
$78 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

502 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record