Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kevin Chaussee

Nurse Practitioner Bismarck, ND Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1962424440 CMS profile 11082185

1421 Mapleton Ave, Bismarck, ND 58503

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,040

213 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kevin Chaussee of Bismarck, ND is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,040 across 213 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $884 65
2024 General $957 65
2023 General $496 31
2022 General $381 28
2021 General $322 24

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kevin Chaussee
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kevin Chaussee were reported at $884. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Kevin Chaussee Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $322 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $381 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $496 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $957 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $884 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,156 99 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $431 18 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $421 48 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $202 10 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $183 15 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $172 2 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $97 3 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $92 6 payments
  9. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $67 1 payment
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $51 3 payments
  11. Other $168 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,798 209 payments
  2. Education $241 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DUPIXENT $836 29 payments
  2. SKYRIZI Immunology $652 54 payments
  3. TALTZ $252 27 payments
  4. RINVOQ $219 19 payments
  5. EBGLYSS $218 28 payments
  6. SOTYKTU $183 15 payments
  7. SKYRIZI Immunology $169 17 payments
  8. COSENTYX $144 7 payments
  9. HUMIRA $126 10 payments
  10. OLUMIANT $122 12 payments
  11. Other $517 27 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

810

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$16,097

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

5.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 146 $3,971
Ketoconazole Generic 152 $2,736
Fluocinonide Generic 55 $2,013
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 164 $1,241
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 28 $1,226
Spironolactone Generic 76 $1,191
Metronidazole Generic 25 $1,047
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 35 $1,023
Fluorouracil Generic 11 $477
Ciclopirox Generic 14 $376

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$731,289

Of which drugs: $614,214

Medicare patients

743

Average age 74

Services billed

10,384

317 women, 426 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Cancer 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tildrakizumab, 1 mg J3245 Office 18 5,600 $601,064
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 39 42 $13,044
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 25 166 $106

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $239
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $72
$311 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $169
$169 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $124
$124 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $67
$67 — —
Cabtreo
  • Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $67
$67 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

213 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in North Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record