Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ketankumar Vaidya

Geriatric Medicine Edison, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1487688586 CMS profile 67471

2149 Woodbridge Ave, Edison, NJ 08817

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,149

447 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ketankumar Vaidya of Edison, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,149 across 447 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $643 38
2024 General $981 42
2023 General $558 23
2022 General $1,380 65
2021 General $1,533 75
2020 General $1,260 72
2019 General $1,795 132

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ketankumar Vaidya
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ketankumar Vaidya were reported at $643. Among 1,028 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $123 and the middle half received between $35 and $408.

Show as a table
Year Ketankumar Vaidya Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,795 $122 $40–$435 $163
2020 $1,260 $98 $25–$349 $114
2021 $1,533 $125 $34–$441 $132
2022 $1,380 $124 $36–$408 $149
2023 $558 $121 $41–$383 $160
2024 $981 $134 $41–$435 $164
2025 $643 $123 $35–$408 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,891 169 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $906 9 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $705 43 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $613 21 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $451 36 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $399 36 payments
  7. Medtronic, Inc. $385 3 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $325 13 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $247 18 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $246 3 payments
  11. Other $1,980 96 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,999 442 payments
  2. Education $150 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,600 158 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,151 97 payments
  3. Omnia $735 7 payments
  4. XARELTO $439 35 payments
  5. FARXIGA $370 12 payments
  6. ENTRESTO $348 26 payments
  7. LEQVIO $341 16 payments
  8. Kerendia $325 13 payments
  9. BREZTRI $285 6 payments
  10. LOKELMA $282 6 payments
  11. Other $4,890 302 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 251 drugs

Part D claims

25,119

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,495,132

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 605 $405,807
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 280 $311,895
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 365 $278,410
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 293 $235,509
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 434 $230,289
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 240 $202,546
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 237 $159,615
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 267 $157,549
Omeprazole-Sodium Bicarbonate Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Brand 36 $131,293
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 159 $110,329

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 251 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$216,676

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

445

Average age 77

Services billed

3,000

257 women, 188 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Arthritis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Heart failure 22%
COPD 16%
Depression 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $225
$225 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $125
$125 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $75
$75 365 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $74
$74 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $61
$61 23 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

447 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record