Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kermit Gibson

General Practice Elkhorn City, KY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1083760649 CMS profile 48920

165 E Main St, Elkhorn City, KY 41522

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,422

48 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kermit Gibson of Elkhorn City, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,422 across 48 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $50 2
2024 General $240 4
2023 General $252 5
2022 General $175 6
2021 General $84 6
2020 General $81 4
2019 General $539 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kermit Gibson
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kermit Gibson were reported at $50. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Kermit Gibson General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $539 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $81 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $84 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $175 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $252 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $240 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $50 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $599 15 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $314 5 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $132 5 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $116 8 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $80 4 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $47 2 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $28 2 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $27 1 payment
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $25 2 payments
  10. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $23 2 payments
  11. Other $31 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,422 48 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $325 10 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $211 4 payments
  3. AIRSUPRA $105 1 payment
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $103 1 payment
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $103 3 payments
  6. BREZTRI $100 1 payment
  7. TRULICITY $86 6 payments
  8. MOVANTIK $71 3 payments
  9. LEQVIO $57 3 payments
  10. ENTRESTO $57 3 payments
  11. Other $400 23 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 173 drugs

Part D claims

14,621

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$693,176

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

16%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 84 $100,156
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 94 $57,216
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 45 $52,121
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 56 $38,329
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 68 $36,493
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 49 $36,361
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 58 $35,472
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 26 $29,929
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 38 $27,313
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 32 $23,765

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 173 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$31,206

Of which drugs: $1,172

Medicare patients

147

Average age 69

Services billed

5,651

59 women, 88 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
COPD 36%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 28%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 16 4,504 $481
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 13 94 $399
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 11 11 $241
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 14 100 $8

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $105
$105 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $103
$103 56 —
CAPLYTA
  • ITI, Inc. $16
$16 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $16
$16 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

48 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record