Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Reed

Pain Medicine Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1033315437 CMS profile 228578

9320 S Mingo Rd, Tulsa, OK 74133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,149

402 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Reed of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,149 across 402 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $982 28
2024 General $611 31
2023 General $801 47
2022 General $1,026 62
2021 General $1,111 78
2020 General $1,161 75
2019 General $1,456 81

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Reed
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Reed were reported at $982. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Reed Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,456 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $1,161 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $1,111 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $1,026 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $801 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $611 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $982 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $898 58 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $627 14 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $572 11 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $513 39 payments
  5. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $498 32 payments
  6. Averitas Pharma Inc. $484 26 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $415 25 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $323 29 payments
  9. Nevro Corp. $321 6 payments
  10. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $307 22 payments
  11. Other $2,192 140 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,149 402 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Qutenza $785 56 payments
  2. RELISTOR $502 38 payments
  3. AIMOVIG $486 29 payments
  4. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $371 8 payments
  5. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $371 30 payments
  6. UBRELVY $320 25 payments
  7. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $307 5 payments
  8. XTAMPZA $254 17 payments
  9. BOTOX Neuroscience $253 11 payments
  10. BELBUCA $244 15 payments
  11. Other $3,607 191 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

4,204

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$194,441

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

67%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,665 $49,834
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 778 $24,767
Buprenorphine Generic 81 $22,854
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 29 $21,504
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 34 $16,112
Hysingla Er Hydrocodone Bitartrate Brand 41 $14,872
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 32 $14,099
Fentanyl Generic 30 $5,657
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 233 $3,799
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 190 $3,648

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$474,530

Of which drugs: $18,681

Medicare patients

452

Average age 70

Services billed

20,121

297 women, 155 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 41%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
COPD 21%
Heart failure 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 311 8,428 $732
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 88 3,518 $343
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 34 2,150 $190
Injection, fentanyl citrate, 0.1 mg J3010 Office 44 85 $54
Injection, cefazolin sodium, 500 mg J0690 Office 12 37 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $149
$149 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $133
$133 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $78
$78 29 —
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $47
$47 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $20
$20 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

402 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record