Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Dawes

Dermatology Indianapolis, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1497758627 CMS profile 158180

7910 N Shadeland Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46250

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$50,831

880 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$87,634

Paid to them · 19 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,163,429 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Dawes of Indianapolis, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $50,831 across 880 general payments and $87,634 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,163,429 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $18,419 143
2025 Research $83,505 17
2024 General $9,334 103
2023 General $2,534 160
2023 Research $629 1
2022 General $2,396 137
2021 General $2,189 106
2020 General $7,586 78
2019 General $8,373 153
2019 Research $3,500 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Dawes
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Dawes were reported at $18,419. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Dawes Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,373 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $7,586 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,189 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,396 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,534 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $9,334 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $18,419 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $24,932 115 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $8,661 195 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $8,063 164 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $1,861 22 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,219 61 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $854 55 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $686 54 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $630 21 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $465 25 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $427 21 payments
  11. Other $3,035 147 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $33,025 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,085 851 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,150 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,178 3 payments
  5. Education $394 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LITFULO $23,635 63 payments
  2. COSENTYX Immunology $7,052 86 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $4,108 67 payments
  4. HUMIRA $2,992 51 payments
  5. CIBINQO $1,710 80 payments
  6. DUPIXENT $1,564 5 payments
  7. RINVOQ $1,205 59 payments
  8. TALTZ $1,085 59 payments
  9. COSENTYX Dermatology $943 43 payments
  10. TREMFYA $824 39 payments
  11. Other $8,279 561 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $83,505 17 payments
  2. Mayne Pharma Inc. $3,500 1 payment
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $629 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugs

Part D claims

3,534

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,847,089

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

13.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 35 $271,654
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 73 $270,573
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 13 $267,195
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 28 $246,963
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 21 $191,418
Otezla Apremilast Brand 34 $161,521
Sotyktu Deucravacitinib Brand 14 $94,268
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 22 $82,103
Odomzo Sonidegib Phosphate Brand 11 $81,898
Siliq Brodalumab Brand 14 $73,686

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 103 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$955,482

Of which drugs: $389,990

Medicare patients

2,756

Average age 75

Services billed

15,518

1,541 women, 1,215 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 21%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 20%
Osteoporosis 17%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tildrakizumab, 1 mg J3245 Office 18 3,300 $355,982
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 62 88 $26,063
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 62 218 $158

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LITFULO
$7,547 — —
VTAMA
$228 — —
DUPIXENT
$223 95 —
RINVOQ
$153 — —
Bimzelx
$141 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

899 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record