Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kenneth Brown

Family Medicine Alexandria, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1497779755 CMS profile 157966

425 Scott St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,929

957 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kenneth Brown of Alexandria, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,929 across 957 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,583 144
2024 General $2,637 144
2023 General $2,758 148
2022 General $1,887 113
2021 General $1,917 116
2020 General $2,616 124
2019 General $2,531 168

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kenneth Brown
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kenneth Brown were reported at $2,583. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Kenneth Brown Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,531 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,616 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,917 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,887 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,758 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,637 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,583 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,282 119 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,154 77 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,927 108 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,565 110 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,030 83 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $773 54 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $735 36 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $728 34 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $712 40 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $696 51 payments
  11. Other $4,327 245 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,388 953 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $512 1 payment
  3. Education $29 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,619 58 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,470 85 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,320 92 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $962 66 payments
  5. QULIPTA $939 46 payments
  6. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $716 32 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $700 54 payments
  8. REXULTI $695 32 payments
  9. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $644 27 payments
  10. Repatha $595 28 payments
  11. Other $12,093 804 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 136 drugs

Part D claims

5,363

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$794,015

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

28.4%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 115 $126,247
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 89 $88,517
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 84 $62,505
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 49 $51,980
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 66 $49,943
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 73 $44,381
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 15 $33,802
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 13 $29,446
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 21 $29,098
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 24 $27,224

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 136 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$65,342

Of which drugs: $4,604

Medicare patients

204

Average age 74

Services billed

1,600

115 women, 89 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 42%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Depression 33%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Heart failure 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 44 44 $3,590

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$395 12 —
FARXIGA
$176 66 —
REXULTI
$170 13 —
VRAYLAR
$167 — —
JARDIANCE
$139 49 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

957 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record