Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Keith Stockerl Goldstein

Medical Oncology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1447315189 CMS profile 155853

4500 Forest Park Ave, Div Im Bone Marrow Transplant, 5Th, 6Th, 8Th Fl, Saint Louis, MO 63108

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,506

11 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$27,055

Paid to them · 7 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,724,588 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Keith Stockerl Goldstein of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,506 across 11 general payments and $27,055 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,724,588 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $150 1
2024 General $3,008 6
2022 General $500 1
2021 General $3,847 3
2019 Research $27,055 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Keith Stockerl Goldstein
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Keith Stockerl Goldstein were reported at $150. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Keith Stockerl Goldstein Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $0 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $3,847 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $500 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $0 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $3,008 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $150 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $2,847 4 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $2,451 1 payment
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,300 1 payment
  4. Pfizer Inc. $650 2 payments
  5. Kite Pharma, Inc. $130 1 payment
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $110 1 payment
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $17 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $6,731 6 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $500 1 payment
  3. Food and Beverage $275 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DARZALEX $2,547 2 payments
  2. BLENREP $1,300 1 payment
  3. TALVEY $300 2 payments
  4. ELREXFIO $150 1 payment
  5. Yescarta $130 1 payment
  6. WAINUA $110 1 payment
  7. VENCLEXTA $17 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $25,283 6 payments
  2. Celgene Corporation $1,772 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugs

Part D claims

2,520

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$12,480,145

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

41.9%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 352 $7,066,711
Lenalidomide Generic 188 $2,732,583
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 81 $1,777,680
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 17 $317,900
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 17 $311,834
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 20 $157,400
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 64 $49,507
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 32 $18,712
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 11 $7,109
Acyclovir Generic 209 $5,710

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 109 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,157,856

Of which drugs: $1,023,100

Medicare patients

415

Average age 72

Services billed

56,074

187 women, 228 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Heart failure 35%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 23 16,740 $642,165
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 16 96 $466
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 13 260 $191
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 23 56 $112
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 16 372 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TALVEY
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $150
$150 — —
ELREXFIO
  • PFIZER INC. $150
$150 — —
Yescarta
  • Kite Pharma, Inc. $130
$130 — —
WAINUA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $110
$110 — —
VENCLEXTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $17
$17 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

18 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record