Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Keith Kellum

Ophthalmology Houma, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1225036023 CMS profile 824944

446 Corporate Drive, Houma, LA 70360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,205

356 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$12,475 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Keith Kellum of Houma, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,205 across 356 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $12,475 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,690 66
2024 General $1,406 61
2023 General $1,646 60
2022 General $1,360 53
2021 General $1,534 56
2020 General $569 27
2019 General $999 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Keith Kellum
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Keith Kellum were reported at $2,690. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Keith Kellum Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $999 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $569 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $1,534 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,360 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,646 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,406 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $2,690 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $2,059 64 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,474 81 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $832 47 payments
  4. Ivantis, Inc $808 21 payments
  5. Sight Sciences, Inc. $738 10 payments
  6. Lumenis BE inc $663 1 payment
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $484 18 payments
  8. Glaukos Corporation $321 5 payments
  9. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $284 13 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $261 14 payments
  11. Other $2,281 82 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,134 354 payments
  2. Gift $45 1 payment
  3. Honoraria $26 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HYDRUS Microstent Ophthalmology $923 24 payments
  2. Hydrus Microstent Ophthalmic Surgery $775 19 payments
  3. M22 $663 1 payment
  4. DURYSTA Eye Care $643 26 payments
  5. LUMIGAN $510 37 payments
  6. DURYSTA Glaucoma $398 30 payments
  7. OMNI SURGICAL SYSTEM $377 6 payments
  8. TYRVAYA $347 13 payments
  9. VYZULTA $236 9 payments
  10. Ahmed Glaucoma Valve $232 5 payments
  11. Other $7,146 264 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

4,446

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$590,405

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

32%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 153 $148,447
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 445 $145,486
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 69 $49,064
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 32 $26,753
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 60 $25,324
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 67 $25,183
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 88 $22,393
Cyclosporine Generic 62 $22,206
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 396 $18,125
Travoprost Generic 119 $13,489

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$532,898

Of which drugs: $211,152

Medicare patients

983

Average age 77

Services billed

7,352

610 women, 373 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Diabetes 35%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 16%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 14 144 $86,372
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 12 370 $47,839

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $219
$219 445 —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $124
$124 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $76
$76 67 —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $74
$74 — —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $70
$70 32 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

356 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record