Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Keith Johnson

Internal Medicine Venice, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1184695710 CMS profile 234570

1370 E Venice Ave, Suite 202, Venice, FL 34285

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,946

979 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Keith Johnson of Venice, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,946 across 979 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,323 103
2024 General $2,269 96
2023 General $1,905 94
2022 General $2,837 140
2021 General $3,277 172
2020 General $2,863 179
2019 General $3,472 195

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Keith Johnson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Keith Johnson were reported at $2,323. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Keith Johnson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,472 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,863 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,277 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,837 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,905 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,269 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,323 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,124 118 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,962 93 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,505 79 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,410 59 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,096 63 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $801 43 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $756 39 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $570 40 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $536 30 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $517 24 payments
  11. Other $7,668 391 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,886 975 payments
  2. Education $60 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $1,129 58 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,093 61 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $868 49 payments
  4. UBRELVY $755 37 payments
  5. FARXIGA $733 31 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $670 33 payments
  7. AIMOVIG $623 38 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $600 35 payments
  9. Otezla $526 36 payments
  10. QULIPTA $525 28 payments
  11. Other $17,757 978 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 145 drugs

Part D claims

7,934

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$897,753

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 147 $167,454
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 64 $104,269
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 80 $97,013
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 64 $71,235
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 61 $58,703
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 38 $44,518
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 20 $28,444
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 37 $27,996
Xultophy 100-3.6 Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Brand 17 $27,905
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 16 $21,391

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 145 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 94 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$229,003

Of which drugs: $5,463

Medicare patients

360

Average age 76

Services billed

5,019

164 women, 196 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Ischemic heart disease 50%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 24%
COPD 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 11 11 $900

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$145 — —
ZEPBOUND
$141 — —
Kerendia
$134 — —
UBRELVY
$94 — —
NURTEC ODT
$83 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

979 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record