Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Keith Georger

Internal Medicine Arnold, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1649581745 CMS profile 119913

18 Fox Valley Ctr, Arnold, MO 63010

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,826

855 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Keith Georger of Arnold, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,826 across 855 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,323 133
2024 General $2,463 134
2023 General $2,488 132
2022 General $2,364 127
2021 General $2,386 143
2020 General $1,306 81
2019 General $1,496 105

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Keith Georger
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Keith Georger were reported at $2,323. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Keith Georger Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,496 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,306 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,386 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,364 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,488 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,463 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,323 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,016 202 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,280 66 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,148 77 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,012 56 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $702 58 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $682 50 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $563 33 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $442 28 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $332 15 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $322 18 payments
  11. Other $4,327 252 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,773 852 payments
  2. Education $52 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $2,473 106 payments
  2. QULIPTA $1,042 47 payments
  3. FARXIGA $825 39 payments
  4. Ozempic $803 53 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $678 45 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $478 39 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $476 22 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $467 40 payments
  9. UBRELVY Neuroscience $432 24 payments
  10. BREZTRI $422 16 payments
  11. Other $10,292 644 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 176 drugs

Part D claims

14,999

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,266,792

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 168 $178,196
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 129 $140,192
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 102 $125,870
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 92 $113,629
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 74 $102,100
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 37 $84,558
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 76 $83,507
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 44 $26,140
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 27 $22,022
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 26 $20,518

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 176 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$52,091

Of which drugs: $11,711

Medicare patients

198

Average age 72

Services billed

951

104 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 36 36 $2,886

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$319 — —
UBRELVY
$182 — —
Auvelity
$146 — —
VRAYLAR
$138 — —
FARXIGA
$132 74 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

855 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record