Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kathryn Olsen

Physician Assistant Loveland, CO Physician Assistant

NPI 1902889124 CMS profile 10845899

1708 Boise Ave, Loveland, CO 80537

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$66,973

796 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kathryn Olsen of Loveland, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $66,973 across 796 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $28,526 164
2024 General $24,709 192
2023 General $8,988 181
2022 General $2,516 143
2021 General $2,234 116

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kathryn Olsen
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kathryn Olsen were reported at $28,526. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Kathryn Olsen Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,234 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,516 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $8,988 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $24,709 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $28,526 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $52,030 143 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $3,446 57 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,283 141 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,202 71 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,003 41 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $928 46 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $794 33 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $788 33 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $764 30 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $741 40 payments
  11. Other $2,993 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $44,077 27 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,291 728 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,285 28 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,550 2 payments
  5. Education $770 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $51,830 129 payments
  2. EBGLYSS $2,796 14 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $1,214 77 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $957 46 payments
  5. Otezla $928 46 payments
  6. SOTYKTU $716 39 payments
  7. TALTZ $676 45 payments
  8. RINVOQ $611 48 payments
  9. OPZELURA $546 39 payments
  10. Bimzelx $546 21 payments
  11. Other $7,356 412 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

708

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$261,098

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

11.9%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Otezla Apremilast Brand 32 $154,654
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 19 $86,102
Fluorouracil Generic 57 $3,558
Metronidazole Generic 51 $3,377
Tacrolimus Generic 20 $3,142
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 58 $1,691
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 150 $1,680
Tretinoin Generic 12 $1,418
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 33 $1,110
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 37 $967

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$145,467

Of which drugs: $1,935

Medicare patients

873

Average age 74

Services billed

4,661

566 women, 307 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 53%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Diabetes 16%
Depression 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 36 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$21,815 — —
DUPIXENT
$362 19 —
Bimzelx
$330 — —
COSENTYX
$289 — —
Otezla
$258 32 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

796 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record