Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Katherine Lee

Dermatology Laguna Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1265693691 CMS profile 997837

24431 Calle De La Louisa, Suite 200, Laguna Hills, CA 92653

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$56,417

681 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$21,478

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$65,830 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Katherine Lee of Laguna Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $56,417 across 681 general payments and $21,478 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $65,830 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $18,841 144
2025 Research $2,294 4
2024 General $6,063 142
2024 Research $10,923 7
2023 General $2,131 111
2023 Research $8,262 1
2022 General $13,491 90
2021 General $11,037 84
2020 General $1,239 53
2019 General $3,614 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Katherine Lee
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Katherine Lee were reported at $18,841. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Katherine Lee Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,614 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,239 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $11,037 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $13,491 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,131 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $6,063 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $18,841 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Botanix SB Inc $16,224 13 payments
  2. Barco, Inc. $16,191 2 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $5,934 78 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $3,811 18 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $2,786 19 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $2,785 146 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,271 42 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $867 34 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $850 28 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $795 45 payments
  11. Other $4,902 256 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $25,556 11 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $14,841 3 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $13,636 653 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,820 5 payments
  5. Education $564 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SOFDRA $16,224 13 payments
  2. CIBINQO $5,264 50 payments
  3. Bimzelx $3,744 15 payments
  4. EUCRISA $1,185 59 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,060 60 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Immunology $977 33 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $968 31 payments
  8. RINVOQ $881 41 payments
  9. TREMFYA $726 27 payments
  10. OPZELURA $723 44 payments
  11. Other $8,003 408 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi US Services Inc. $13,216 11 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $8,262 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

779

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$195,628

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 26 $95,171
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $42,694
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $22,663
Enstilar Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Brand 11 $14,744
Ketoconazole Generic 152 $3,722
Tacrolimus Generic 30 $3,217
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 63 $2,722
Metronidazole Generic 40 $1,682
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 38 $1,615
Fluorouracil Generic 31 $1,538

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$124,470

Of which drugs: $3,233

Medicare patients

251

Average age 75

Services billed

3,926

157 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Diabetes 18%
Depression 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$3,624 — —
DUPIXENT
$354 37 —
SKYRIZI
$210 — —
RINVOQ
$139 — —
OPZELURA
$132 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

693 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record