Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Katherine Carroll

Neurology Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1689795122 CMS profile 258559

233 E Erie St, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60611

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$83,666

213 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Katherine Carroll of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $83,666 across 213 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $308 3
2024 General $61 2
2023 General $512 16
2022 General $40 3
2021 General $30,217 54
2020 General $30,085 64
2019 General $22,443 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Katherine Carroll
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Katherine Carroll were reported at $308. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Katherine Carroll Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $22,443 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $30,085 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $30,217 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $40 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $512 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $61 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $308 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $43,034 96 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $22,660 40 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $14,406 59 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $2,800 1 payment
  5. Biogen, Inc. $150 1 payment
  6. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $135 1 payment
  7. Amgen Inc. $125 1 payment
  8. Lundbeck LLC $98 2 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $73 3 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $68 3 payments
  11. Other $118 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $64,500 51 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $13,100 6 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $3,742 128 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,114 22 payments
  5. Education $210 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMGALITY $22,655 40 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $17,422 56 payments
  3. BOTOX Neuroscience $10,768 5 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $8,578 30 payments
  5. REYVOW $7,875 11 payments
  6. TYSABRI $150 1 payment
  7. BOTOX COSMETIC $124 3 payments
  8. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $121 1 payment
  9. NURTEC ODT $68 3 payments
  10. QULIPTA $54 4 payments
  11. Other $234 10 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

700

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$157,132

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

30.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 56 $77,423
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 23 $28,260
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 26 $19,205
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 16 $18,859
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 48 $3,277
Gabapentin Generic 128 $2,118
Carbamazepine Er Carbamazepine Brand 21 $1,254
Pregabalin Generic 38 $853
Propranolol Hcl Generic 14 $778
Levetiracetam Generic 25 $757

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$127,003

Of which drugs: $75,961

Medicare patients

254

Average age 73

Services billed

16,292

168 women, 86 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 61%
High blood pressure 57%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Osteoporosis 26%
Depression 25%
Diabetes 20%
Cancer 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 30 15,500 $75,840

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $34
$34 — —
OCREVUS
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $26
$26 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

213 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record