Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Karen Rosen-Wasserman

Pain Medicine Warren, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679932206 CMS profile 4224651

13850 E 12 Mile Rd, Warren, MI 48088

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,546

251 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Karen Rosen-Wasserman of Warren, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,546 across 251 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $71 3
2024 General $1,821 104
2023 General $1,553 88
2022 General $1,969 52
2021 General $16 1
2020 General $47 2
2019 General $69 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Karen Rosen-Wasserman
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Karen Rosen-Wasserman were reported at $71. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Karen Rosen-Wasserman Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $69 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $47 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $16 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $1,969 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $1,553 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $1,821 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $71 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nalu Medical, Inc. $1,182 11 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $746 41 payments
  3. Lundbeck LLC $307 19 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $304 25 payments
  5. EMD Serono, Inc. $301 18 payments
  6. SK Life Science, Inc. $279 12 payments
  7. Eisai Inc. $235 10 payments
  8. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $214 10 payments
  9. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $203 11 payments
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $172 10 payments
  11. Other $1,604 84 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,578 248 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $968 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nalu Neurostimulation System $1,182 11 payments
  2. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $336 15 payments
  3. UBRELVY $260 19 payments
  4. VYEPTI $250 16 payments
  5. Leqembi $215 9 payments
  6. BRIUMVI $214 10 payments
  7. QULIPTA $207 15 payments
  8. INGREZZA $203 11 payments
  9. Nayzilam $188 15 payments
  10. BOTOX Neuroscience $176 8 payments
  11. Other $2,299 127 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

3,767

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$131,764

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

49.2%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 32 $27,799
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 38 $20,973
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 858 $16,786
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 557 $11,970
Fentanyl Generic 80 $11,390
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 245 $8,015
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 27 $6,122
Gabapentin Generic 368 $5,510
Naloxone Hcl Generic 63 $4,663
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 114 $2,148

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$59,212

Of which drugs: $1,557

Medicare patients

176

Average age 64

Services billed

2,142

103 women, 73 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 45%
Diabetes 40%
COPD 36%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 15 130 $539
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 48 812 $65
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 23 140 $63
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 22 59 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $215
$215 — —
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $118
$118 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $117
$117 — —
INGREZZA
  • Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $113
$113 — —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $65
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $47
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

251 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record