Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Karen Devore

Dermatology Spartanburg, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1821098823 CMS profile 36811

490 Floyd Rd, Spartanburg, SC 29307

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,260

812 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$85,670 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Karen Devore of Spartanburg, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,260 across 812 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $85,670 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,563 129
2024 General $2,617 127
2023 General $2,244 121
2022 General $2,151 128
2021 General $1,622 100
2020 General $2,372 106
2019 General $1,692 101

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Karen Devore
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Karen Devore were reported at $2,563. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Karen Devore Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,692 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,372 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,622 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,151 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,244 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,617 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $2,563 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,002 150 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,266 147 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,263 70 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,215 70 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,006 49 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $845 49 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $807 36 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $758 42 payments
  9. PruGen, Inc. Pharmaceuticals $534 1 payment
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $508 27 payments
  11. Other $3,057 171 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,058 796 payments
  2. Education $1,202 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,535 116 payments
  2. Otezla $1,111 62 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $932 63 payments
  4. CIBINQO $811 46 payments
  5. STELARA $776 58 payments
  6. HUMIRA $774 51 payments
  7. Bimzelx $773 35 payments
  8. RINVOQ $687 42 payments
  9. ILUMYA $551 27 payments
  10. EUCRISA $547 30 payments
  11. Other $8,049 464 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,670

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,517,077

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

33.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 56 $359,081
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $270,283
Otezla Apremilast Brand 47 $228,294
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 24 $176,089
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 12 $163,223
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 17 $124,672
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 24 $90,037
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 11 $42,449
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 17 $33,957
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 94 $3,948

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$320,869

Of which drugs: $86

Medicare patients

1,349

Average age 76

Services billed

7,408

758 women, 591 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Depression 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 27 127 $86

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $562
$562 12 —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $286
$286 — —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $233
$233 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $174
$174 56 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $149
$149 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

812 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record