Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kandasami Senthilkumar

Neurology Beaumont, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1811990369 CMS profile 218111

740 Hospital Dr Ste 100, Beaumont, TX 77701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,790

579 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$413,818

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$7,569,008 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Kandasami Senthilkumar of Beaumont, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,790 across 579 general payments and $413,818 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $7,569,008 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,301 65
2024 General $682 43
2024 Research $159,930 1
2023 General $1,445 75
2022 General $1,455 99
2022 Research $253,888 1
2021 General $1,712 109
2020 General $1,283 76
2019 General $1,912 112

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kandasami Senthilkumar
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kandasami Senthilkumar were reported at $1,301. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Kandasami Senthilkumar Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,912 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $1,283 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $1,712 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $1,455 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,445 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $682 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,301 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $1,663 130 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,162 90 payments
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $892 51 payments
  4. Biogen, Inc. $692 18 payments
  5. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $505 22 payments
  6. Lundbeck LLC $418 25 payments
  7. SK Life Science, Inc. $331 14 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $310 11 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $233 12 payments
  10. EMD Serono, Inc. $230 15 payments
  11. Other $3,353 191 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,229 569 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $450 3 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $95 4 payments
  4. Education $16 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NUPLAZID Parkinsons Disease Psychosis $1,093 78 payments
  2. AJOVY $696 37 payments
  3. QULIPTA $621 46 payments
  4. NUPLAZID Parkinsons Disease Psychosis $571 52 payments
  5. UBRELVY $516 39 payments
  6. TYSABRI $472 4 payments
  7. INGREZZA $416 18 payments
  8. DUOPA $374 31 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $322 23 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $318 22 payments
  11. Other $4,902 268 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $413,818 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

5,998

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$784,022

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

22%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 18 $219,302
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 18 $120,521
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 72 $75,802
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 60 $49,878
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 35 $42,521
Memantine Hcl Generic 1,004 $32,679
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 12 $27,304
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 16 $25,701
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 16 $21,320
Levetiracetam Generic 555 $20,064

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$190,361

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

665

Average age 75

Services billed

3,343

402 women, 263 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Depression 32%
Alzheimer's or dementia 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Osteoporosis 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NUPLAZID
  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $208
$208 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $66
$66 16 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $66
$66 72 —
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $66
$66 — —
VALTOCO
  • Neurelis, Inc. $50
$50 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

581 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record