Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kalarickal Oommen

Clinical Neurophysiology Lubbock, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1609843655 CMS profile 163041

3506 21St St, Suite 400, Lubbock, TX 79410

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$48,279

1,018 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$10,864 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Kalarickal Oommen of Lubbock, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $48,279 across 1,018 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $10,864 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,005 86
2024 General $2,660 132
2023 General $3,698 150
2022 General $2,666 162
2021 General $9,528 197
2020 General $14,004 151
2019 General $13,719 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kalarickal Oommen
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kalarickal Oommen were reported at $2,005. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Kalarickal Oommen Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $13,719 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $14,004 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $9,528 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $2,666 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $3,698 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $2,660 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $2,005 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SK Life Science, Inc. $13,777 44 payments
  2. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $7,819 34 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $7,003 80 payments
  4. LivaNova USA, Inc. $5,594 13 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $2,186 148 payments
  6. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,456 118 payments
  7. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $981 59 payments
  8. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $686 30 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $542 42 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $536 32 payments
  11. Other $7,699 418 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,202 988 payments
  2. Honoraria $14,600 7 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $11,882 14 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,500 1 payment
  5. Travel and Lodging $2,095 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. APTIOM $7,750 28 payments
  2. XCOPRI $6,908 5 payments
  3. Briviact $6,583 62 payments
  4. Cenobamate $6,200 2 payments
  5. VNS Therapy $4,339 11 payments
  6. UBRELVY $1,285 94 payments
  7. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR $1,255 2 payments
  8. QULIPTA $1,207 75 payments
  9. Epidiolex $783 36 payments
  10. TROKENDI XR $729 61 payments
  11. Other $12,664 739 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

2,441

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,142,787

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

39.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 133 $208,994
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 148 $173,633
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 96 $158,707
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 47 $145,105
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 97 $141,902
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 18 $34,107
Trokendi Xr Topiramate Brand 16 $30,347
Lacosamide Generic 225 $30,216
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 26 $28,089
Keppra Xr Levetiracetam Brand 16 $18,380

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,744

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

232

Average age 65

Services billed

369

115 women, 117 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 44%
Depression 41%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Heart failure 23%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$352 26 —
Leqembi
$229 — —
UBRELVY
$212 11 —
NUPLAZID
$197 — —
Fintepla
$193 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,018 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record