Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Justin Spaulding

Glaucoma Specialist Medford, OR Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1013259167 CMS profile 137351

1408 E Barnett Rd, Medford, OR 97504

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$68,865

127 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$240,709 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2024

Through program year 2025, Justin Spaulding of Medford, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $68,865 across 127 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $240,709 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $63,847 36
2024 General $661 20
2023 General $769 18
2022 General $2,817 31
2021 General $234 6
2020 General $188 4
2019 General $350 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Justin Spaulding
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Justin Spaulding were reported at $63,847. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Justin Spaulding Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $350 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $188 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $234 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $2,817 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $769 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $661 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $63,847 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $63,509 27 payments
  2. Nova Eye, Inc. $2,471 6 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $1,063 24 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $228 12 payments
  5. Glaukos Corporation $181 4 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $164 9 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $145 6 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $123 2 payments
  9. TissueTech, Inc. $115 2 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $112 5 payments
  11. Other $754 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $62,000 2 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $3,965 112 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,855 12 payments
  4. Gift $45 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HYDRUS Microstent $636 7 payments
  2. XIIDRA $189 10 payments
  3. Centurion $147 4 payments
  4. Cequa $146 8 payments
  5. VYZULTA $130 7 payments
  6. LOTEMAX SM $125 2 payments
  7. MIEBO $118 6 payments
  8. AmnioGuard $115 2 payments
  9. Prokera $115 2 payments
  10. AmnioGraft $115 2 payments
  11. Other $2,272 90 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

5,490

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$252,865

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

13.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 877 $45,191
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 45 $33,922
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 56 $27,325
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 110 $23,340
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 41 $18,030
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 25 $16,720
Latanoprost Generic 1,167 $15,252
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 24 $14,311
Travoprost Generic 89 $10,695
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 866 $10,133

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,097,223

Of which drugs: $536,533

Medicare patients

1,454

Average age 77

Services billed

254,500

865 women, 589 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 52 446 $294,134
Chloroprocaine hcl ophthalmic, 3% gel, 1 mg J2403 Office 70 246,003 $126,323
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 11 795 $93,188
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 20 183 $22,854
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 36 41 $31

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $59
$59 — —
OXERVATE
  • Dompe US, Inc. $58
$58 — —
IHEEZO
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $27
$27 — 246,003
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $25
$25 45 —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

127 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in Oregon

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record