Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Justin Parschauer

Ophthalmology Tulsa, OK Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1073845921 CMS profile 139929

6600 S Yale Ave, Suite 800, Tulsa, OK 74136

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,666

94 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$882,092 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Justin Parschauer of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,666 across 94 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $882,092 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 66th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $777 26
2024 General $701 25
2023 General $386 13
2022 General $423 16
2021 General $95 5
2020 General $64 3
2019 General $221 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Justin Parschauer
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Justin Parschauer were reported at $777. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Justin Parschauer Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $221 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $64 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $95 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $423 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $386 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $701 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $777 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $479 15 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $416 14 payments
  3. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $265 7 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $219 6 payments
  5. Coherus Biosciences Inc. $209 5 payments
  6. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $185 6 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $151 8 payments
  8. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $148 7 payments
  9. Sandoz Inc. $148 8 payments
  10. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $98 4 payments
  11. Other $350 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,666 94 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VABYSMO $494 15 payments
  2. Cimerli $319 11 payments
  3. OZURDEX Retina $251 8 payments
  4. EYLEA HD $246 6 payments
  5. Syfovre $243 6 payments
  6. EYLEA $170 8 payments
  7. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $148 7 payments
  8. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $127 4 payments
  9. OZURDEX Eye Care $119 6 payments
  10. Izervay $81 4 payments
  11. Other $405 19 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 4 drugs

Part D claims

96

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$6,871

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

13.5%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 13 $2,826
Difluprednate Generic 15 $1,789
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 39 $1,417
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 29 $839

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,631,955

Of which drugs: $3,248,110

Medicare patients

1,056

Average age 77

Services billed

110,903

645 women, 411 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 43%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Heart failure 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Depression 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 354 102,241 $2,764,433
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 141 2,163 $393,907
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 21 106 $69,412
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 55 127 $6,470

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $177
$177 — —
Cimerli
  • Sandoz Inc. $110
  • Coherus Biosciences Inc. $43
$153 — 2,163
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $61
$61 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $45
  • Genentech, Inc. $13
$58 — 102,241
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $43
$43 — 106

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

94 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record