Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Justin Kanoff

Retina Specialist Longmont, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1326205048 CMS profile 1254917

1400 Dry Creek Dr, Longmont, CO 80503

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,430

143 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$9,500 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Justin Kanoff of Longmont, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,430 across 143 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $9,500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 61st percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $548 24
2024 General $627 19
2023 General $1,255 31
2022 General $514 15
2021 General $173 10
2020 General $297 17
2019 General $1,017 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Justin Kanoff
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Justin Kanoff were reported at $548. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Justin Kanoff Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $1,017 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $297 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $173 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $514 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $1,255 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $627 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $548 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $558 13 payments
  2. RxSight Inc $497 4 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $486 19 payments
  4. Genentech, Inc. $330 15 payments
  5. Alcon Vision LLC $330 12 payments
  6. NotalVision $281 3 payments
  7. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $261 11 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $179 5 payments
  9. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $158 9 payments
  10. Omeros Corporation $142 2 payments
  11. Other $1,209 50 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,127 139 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $269 2 payments
  3. Entertainment $34 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VABYSMO $659 17 payments
  2. RXSIGHT LIGHT ADJUSTABLE LENS (RXLAL) $489 3 payments
  3. RXSIGHT LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE (LDD) $489 3 payments
  4. RXSIGHT CONTACT LENS $489 3 payments
  5. RXSIGHT INJECTOR CARTRIDGE $489 3 payments
  6. RXSIGHT INJECTOR HANDPIECE $489 3 payments
  7. EYLEA HD $330 13 payments
  8. Syfovre $211 9 payments
  9. Lucentis $161 8 payments
  10. EYLEA $156 6 payments
  11. Other $2,064 88 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 9 drugs

Part D claims

586

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$21,461

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cyclosporine Generic 20 $7,755
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 143 $6,423
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 70 $1,655
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 40 $1,489
Latanoprost Generic 123 $1,476
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 58 $1,326
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 13 $467
Polymyxin B Sul-Trimethoprim Polymyxin B Sulf/Trimethoprim Brand 55 $456
Timolol Maleate Generic 64 $416

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,049,284

Of which drugs: $1,625,472

Medicare patients

839

Average age 76

Services billed

39,532

495 women, 344 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 83 30,540 $838,631
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 77 842 $551,633
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 23 1,680 $197,265

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $269
  • Genentech, Inc. $24
$293 — 30,540
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $136
$136 — —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $35
$35 — —
SUSVIMO
  • Genentech, Inc. $32
$32 — —
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $30
$30 — 1,680

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

143 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record