Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jungjae Lim

Pain Medicine Granada Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1689029563 CMS profile 9676731

10700 Balboa Blvd, Granada Hills, CA 91344

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,144

534 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$16

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jungjae Lim of Granada Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,144 across 534 general payments and $16 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,617 154
2024 General $3,669 131
2023 General $3,693 128
2022 General $7,571 113
2021 General $594 8
2021 Research $16 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jungjae Lim
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jungjae Lim were reported at $3,617. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Jungjae Lim Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $0 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $594 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $7,571 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $3,693 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $3,669 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $3,617 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $7,105 161 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $3,189 43 payments
  3. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $1,702 100 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $1,532 78 payments
  5. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $1,091 14 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $942 20 payments
  7. IBSA Pharma Inc. $903 42 payments
  8. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $428 7 payments
  9. Curonix LLC $333 4 payments
  10. SI-BONE, Inc. $255 10 payments
  11. Other $1,664 55 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,475 508 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,669 26 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $3,760 90 payments
  2. Superion Indirect Decompression System $1,177 7 payments
  3. Intracept $1,102 11 payments
  4. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $1,091 14 payments
  5. Licart $903 42 payments
  6. MEDTRONIC REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS $897 3 payments
  7. VANTA ADAPTIVESTIM $833 35 payments
  8. Tirosint $750 36 payments
  9. Prospera $742 34 payments
  10. Omnia $637 8 payments
  11. Other $7,741 281 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $16 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,480

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$67,849

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

40.9%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Licart Diclofenac Epolamine Brand 21 $15,795
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 19 $15,111
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 247 $6,743
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 197 $6,134
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 13 $5,314
Morphine Sulfate Generic 28 $3,329
Gabapentin Generic 173 $3,028
Butalb-Acetaminoph-Caff-Codein Butalbit/Acetamin/Caff/Codeine Brand 13 $2,294
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 79 $1,284
Naloxone Hcl Generic 18 $1,057

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$212,499

Of which drugs: $8,110

Medicare patients

384

Average age 76

Services billed

4,216

241 women, 143 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Osteoporosis 31%
Depression 27%
Diabetes 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, trivisc, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7329 Office 12 1,375 $7,831
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 105 341 $250
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 14 44 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Tirosint
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $77
$77 — —
Licart
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $77
$77 21 —
HORIZANT
  • CutisPharma, Inc. $49
$49 — —
Xeomin
  • Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $31
$31 — —
LEVORPHANOL TARTRATE
  • Virtus Pharmaceuticals LLC $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

535 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record