Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Julie Schwartzbard

Neurology Aventura, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1578558821 CMS profile 116275

21000 Ne 28Th Ave Ste 205, Aventura, FL 33180

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$443,652

1,049 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$349,308

Paid to them · 22 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$13,149,870 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Julie Schwartzbard of Aventura, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $443,652 across 1,049 general payments and $349,308 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $13,149,870 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $24,829 36
2025 Research $277,622 3
2024 General $49,658 62
2024 Research $19,430 3
2023 General $86,474 117
2023 Research $358 2
2022 General $58,905 177
2022 Research $7,770 5
2021 General $70,337 209
2021 Research $5,225 2
2020 General $71,865 209
2020 Research $5,416 5
2019 General $81,585 239
2019 Research $33,487 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Julie Schwartzbard
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Julie Schwartzbard were reported at $24,829. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Julie Schwartzbard Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $81,585 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $71,865 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $70,337 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $58,905 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $86,474 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $49,658 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $24,829 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $132,079 216 payments
  2. Eisai Inc. $110,876 74 payments
  3. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $43,802 78 payments
  4. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $26,471 48 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $25,609 104 payments
  6. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $21,078 34 payments
  7. Eli Lilly and Company $19,693 13 payments
  8. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $19,534 28 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $13,069 37 payments
  10. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $10,913 34 payments
  11. Other $20,529 383 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $244,913 180 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $104,197 34 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $39,243 108 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $18,269 699 payments
  5. Honoraria $17,786 12 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $17,258 9 payments
  7. Education $1,902 5 payments
  8. Grant $85 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Leqembi $94,843 64 payments
  2. EMGALITY $61,276 102 payments
  3. INBRIJA $43,464 71 payments
  4. UBRELVY $23,709 53 payments
  5. NUEDEXTA $21,078 34 payments
  6. REYVOW $18,875 22 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $13,933 52 payments
  8. ONGENTYS $13,790 15 payments
  9. GOCOVRI $10,913 34 payments
  10. RYTARY $10,324 21 payments
  11. Other $40,312 503 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $277,778 4 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $70,703 17 payments
  3. Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch $827 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

211

Median for Psychiatry & Neurology: 100

Drug cost

$140,871

Median for Psychiatry & Neurology: $2,986

Branded share of claims

48.8%

Median for Psychiatry & Neurology: 16.2%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 17 $83,007
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 18 $36,019
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 18 $15,897
Memantine Hcl Er Memantine Hcl Brand 14 $2,271
Carbamazepine Er Carbamazepine Brand 14 $674
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 22 $658
Lamotrigine Generic 11 $476
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 12 $440
Donepezil Hcl Generic 23 $352
Gabapentin Generic 16 $318

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,755 Part D prescribers listed as Psychiatry & Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
$30,797 — —
ONGENTYS 50MG CAPSULES 30
$699 — —
CREXONT
$622 — —
DUOPA
$122 — —
RYTARY
$115 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,071 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record