Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Julia Buchfuhrer

Rheumatology Downey, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1093179319 CMS profile 8085920

11480 Brookshire Ave Ste 108, Downey, CA 90241

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$308,454

1,320 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Julia Buchfuhrer of Downey, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $308,454 across 1,320 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $197,871 504
2024 General $84,984 354
2023 General $15,416 216
2022 General $8,995 190
2021 General $1,175 55
2019 General $13 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Julia Buchfuhrer
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Julia Buchfuhrer were reported at $197,871. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Julia Buchfuhrer Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $13 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,175 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $8,995 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $15,416 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $84,984 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $197,871 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $184,488 360 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $80,057 314 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $23,372 125 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $9,745 69 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,673 94 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,454 46 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $905 43 payments
  8. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $812 28 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $552 25 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $528 23 payments
  11. Other $4,868 193 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $223,029 98 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $30,193 102 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $29,137 1,077 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $17,224 9 payments
  5. Honoraria $8,134 7 payments
  6. Education $738 27 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $130,589 187 payments
  2. RINVOQ $52,103 240 payments
  3. EVENITY $51,388 90 payments
  4. TREMFYA $23,208 123 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $15,469 23 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $10,019 33 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $9,609 60 payments
  8. OFEV $1,437 46 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $1,172 64 payments
  10. LUPKYNIS $812 28 payments
  11. Other $11,046 530 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

1,707

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,944,730

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

45.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Krystexxa Pegloticase Brand 19 $1,072,578
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 100 $634,552
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 80 $555,292
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 48 $351,896
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 122 $276,140
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 45 $199,770
Prolia Denosumab Brand 102 $161,578
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 31 $149,009
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 23 $146,559
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $142,271

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,261

Of which drugs: $4,206

Medicare patients

204

Average age 73

Services billed

1,602

168 women, 36 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 49%
Osteoporosis 35%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 63 505 $352
Injection, lidocaine hcl for intravenous infusion, 10 mg J2001 Office 31 61 $1

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
$75,607 19 —
TREMFYA
$1,019 11 —
RINVOQ
$781 100 —
BENLYSTA
$345 31 —
SKYRIZI
$279 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,320 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record