Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Juan De Jesus Kalil

General Practice Belleview, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1306087713 CMS profile 1140127

10250 Se US Highway 441, Belleview, FL 34420

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,578

155 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Juan De Jesus Kalil of Belleview, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,578 across 155 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25 1
2024 General $443 24
2023 General $567 25
2022 General $474 29
2021 General $484 31
2020 General $302 21
2019 General $282 24

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Juan De Jesus Kalil
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Juan De Jesus Kalil were reported at $25. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Juan De Jesus Kalil General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $282 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $302 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $484 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $474 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $567 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $443 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $25 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $648 45 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $390 23 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $254 14 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $145 10 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $119 8 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $106 6 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $96 5 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $93 5 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $81 5 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $80 4 payments
  11. Other $567 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,578 155 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $409 35 payments
  2. Repatha $232 13 payments
  3. Otezla $202 11 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $200 9 payments
  5. UBRELVY $156 11 payments
  6. AREXVY $140 2 payments
  7. ENTRESTO $81 5 payments
  8. Vascepa $80 4 payments
  9. ANORO $80 6 payments
  10. Kerendia $80 4 payments
  11. Other $1,314 80 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 210 drugs

Part D claims

16,683

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$1,590,997

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

19.4%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 152 $191,314
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 167 $190,739
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 86 $111,314
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 69 $88,699
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 57 $83,008
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 77 $77,747
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 54 $66,716
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 13 $59,007
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 38 $50,471
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 69 $49,116

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 210 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$34,469

Of which drugs: $316

Medicare patients

112

Average age 73

Services billed

989

66 women, 46 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Depression 55%
Arthritis 47%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 37%
COPD 33%
Heart failure 28%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 87 $68

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $96
$96 — —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $38
$38 26 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $32
$32 77 —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $31
$31 — —
Veltassa
  • Relypsa, Inc. $28
$28 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

155 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record