Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joshua Whatley

Family Medicine Lake Charles, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1386961787 CMS profile 335838

4345 Nelson Rd Ste 102, Lake Charles, LA 70605

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,667

992 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$349,747 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Joshua Whatley of Lake Charles, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,667 across 992 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $349,747 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,341 130
2024 General $2,214 134
2023 General $2,196 133
2022 General $2,625 158
2021 General $3,627 165
2020 General $1,613 107
2019 General $2,053 165

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joshua Whatley
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joshua Whatley were reported at $2,341. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Joshua Whatley Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,053 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,613 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,627 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,625 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,196 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,214 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,341 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,803 114 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,548 110 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,468 66 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,324 99 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,283 7 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,276 105 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $1,046 78 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $988 54 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $638 40 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $529 30 payments
  11. Other $4,765 289 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,374 986 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,200 1 payment
  3. Gift $59 1 payment
  4. Education $34 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $1,460 17 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,053 78 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,038 37 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $864 64 payments
  5. Repatha $819 64 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $717 37 payments
  7. UBRELVY $696 39 payments
  8. BREZTRI $592 21 payments
  9. QULIPTA $584 30 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $582 40 payments
  11. Other $16,004 1,057 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 175 drugs

Part D claims

13,557

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,695,409

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

25.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 347 $406,521
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 204 $246,836
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 78 $101,095
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 125 $97,980
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 98 $83,323
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 57 $70,905
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 70 $60,647
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 57 $45,468
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 61 $45,413
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 57 $41,999

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 175 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$130,171

Of which drugs: $18,655

Medicare patients

526

Average age 74

Services billed

7,275

236 women, 290 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Cancer 16%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
COPD 10%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 33 33 $9,510
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 98 98 $7,693
Influenza virus vaccine, quadrivalent (aiiv4), inactivated, adjuvanted, preservative free, for injection into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90694 Office 11 11 $834
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 33 88 $371

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$140 98 —
NURTEC ODT
$140 — —
GEMTESA
$138 15 —
Veozah
$118 13 —
QULIPTA
$107 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

992 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record