Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joshua Stolker

Interventional Cardiology Washington, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1447292875 CMS profile 20061

901 Patients First Dr, Washington, MO 63090

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,197,761

1,387 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Joshua Stolker of Washington, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,197,761 across 1,387 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $124,414 115
2024 General $106,026 143
2023 General $162,738 226
2022 General $182,399 181
2021 General $190,104 195
2020 General $213,028 227
2019 General $219,051 300

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joshua Stolker
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joshua Stolker were reported at $124,414. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Joshua Stolker Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $219,051 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $213,028 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $190,104 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $182,399 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $162,738 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $106,026 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $124,414 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $566,899 273 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $224,952 287 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $159,813 209 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $155,753 172 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $52,530 105 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $14,232 15 payments
  7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $9,935 11 payments
  8. Abiomed $1,604 20 payments
  9. Penumbra, Inc. $1,593 9 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $1,563 36 payments
  11. Other $8,886 250 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $940,208 400 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $176,949 47 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $52,772 237 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $27,501 689 payments
  5. Education $332 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $374,110 179 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $153,233 163 payments
  3. FARXIGA $124,749 143 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $115,525 157 payments
  5. BRILINTA $81,389 110 payments
  6. Repatha $50,741 94 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $48,917 37 payments
  8. JARDIANCE Diabetes $44,225 48 payments
  9. Victoza $32,741 15 payments
  10. Kerendia $14,232 15 payments
  11. Other $36,167 378 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 53 drugs

Part D claims

5,785

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,191,380

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

30.9%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 392 $404,147
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 172 $180,957
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 132 $138,199
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 93 $122,655
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 132 $115,091
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 23 $45,157
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 42 $38,696
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 45 $37,652
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 34 $26,541
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 18 $24,350

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 53 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 73 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$95,197

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

750

Average age 76

Services billed

1,353

372 women, 378 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 58%
Arthritis 55%
Chronic kidney disease 44%
Heart failure 41%
Diabetes 38%
Atrial fibrillation 37%
Depression 32%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
$37,157 93 —
JARDIANCE
$30,784 132 —
Repatha
$18,214 132 —
LODOCO
$207 — —
FARXIGA
$142 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,387 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Cardiology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record