Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joseph Samady

Dermatology Oceanside, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1013954908 CMS profile 318675

3629 Vista Way, Oceanside, CA 92056

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,665

463 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$386,104 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Joseph Samady of Oceanside, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,665 across 463 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $386,104 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,477 66
2024 General $1,993 102
2023 General $1,630 81
2022 General $1,688 75
2021 General $1,492 69
2020 General $518 30
2019 General $868 40

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joseph Samady
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joseph Samady were reported at $1,477. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Joseph Samady Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $868 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $518 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,492 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,688 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,630 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,993 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,477 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,600 124 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,463 68 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $740 27 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $652 31 payments
  5. LEO Pharma Inc. $634 31 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $569 16 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $539 25 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $527 18 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $497 18 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $473 19 payments
  11. Other $1,971 86 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,891 453 payments
  2. Education $774 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,189 52 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $1,049 87 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $857 31 payments
  4. TALTZ $612 29 payments
  5. ADBRY $508 27 payments
  6. HUMIRA $423 27 payments
  7. RINVOQ $383 21 payments
  8. OPZELURA $373 18 payments
  9. Otezla $324 14 payments
  10. LIBTAYO $323 11 payments
  11. Other $5,275 232 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

1,436

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$676,912

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

8.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $212,895
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 12 $162,089
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 33 $122,915
Otezla Apremilast Brand 13 $66,899
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 16 $59,651
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 16 $13,180
Fluorouracil Generic 168 $10,995
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 95 $6,131
Fluocinonide Generic 156 $4,147
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 111 $2,640

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$368,766

Of which drugs: $26,039

Medicare patients

1,455

Average age 76

Services billed

7,841

643 women, 812 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 39%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Diabetes 17%
Cancer 14%
Depression 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 61 84 $26,015
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 32 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $274
$274 33 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $229
$229 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $217
$217 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $169
$169 — —
ADBRY
  • LEO Pharma Inc. $158
$158 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

463 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record