Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jose Cortes

Internal Medicine New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1710077409 CMS profile 258887

81 Irving Pl, # 1F, New York, NY 10003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$183,575

1,147 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jose Cortes of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $183,575 across 1,147 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $85,938 289
2024 General $3,419 167
2023 General $22,389 168
2022 General $14,214 128
2021 General $7,236 121
2020 General $10,136 108
2019 General $40,243 166

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jose Cortes
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jose Cortes were reported at $85,938. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Jose Cortes Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $40,243 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $10,136 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $7,236 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $14,214 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $22,389 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,419 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $85,938 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $124,142 344 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $48,264 270 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,676 78 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,368 58 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,202 66 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $749 32 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $607 29 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $604 45 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $598 22 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $406 22 payments
  11. Other $3,961 181 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $131,488 58 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $26,384 1,032 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $22,270 48 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,140 1 payment
  5. Education $294 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Descovy $74,820 80 payments
  2. APRETUDE Hiv $41,901 53 payments
  3. Yeztugo $20,396 21 payments
  4. Truvada $17,399 13 payments
  5. Biktarvy $4,934 14 payments
  6. DOVATO $3,071 139 payments
  7. APRETUDE Hiv $1,170 39 payments
  8. SYMTUZA $819 33 payments
  9. PIFELTRO $718 31 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $709 38 payments
  11. Other $16,272 756 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 152 drugs

Part D claims

8,912

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,790,108

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

31.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 262 $1,055,466
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 206 $185,427
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 98 $119,177
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 54 $118,079
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 99 $113,637
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 108 $93,819
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 28 $88,405
Isentress Raltegravir Potassium Brand 45 $83,514
Egrifta Sv Tesamorelin Acetate Brand 11 $81,813
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 20 $81,274

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 152 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$25,968

Of which drugs: $2,389

Medicare patients

92

Average age 75

Services billed

356

44 women, 48 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 34%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Cancer 17%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 26 26 $2,117

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
$723 20 —
APRETUDE
$649 — —
AIRSUPRA
$223 — —
JARDIANCE
$177 76 —
REXULTI
$149 22 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,147 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record