Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jorge Loredo

Internal Medicine Miami, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1073567640 CMS profile 274949

1312 Sw 27Th Ave Fl 3, Miami, FL 33145

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,183

824 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$10,546 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Jorge Loredo of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,183 across 824 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $10,546 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,452 76
2024 General $1,723 86
2023 General $2,296 124
2022 General $2,798 148
2021 General $2,803 147
2020 General $2,255 133
2019 General $1,855 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jorge Loredo
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jorge Loredo were reported at $1,452. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Jorge Loredo Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,855 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,255 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,803 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,798 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,296 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,723 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,452 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,553 119 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,310 80 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,231 67 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,115 61 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,015 58 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $929 54 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $687 34 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $594 33 payments
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $585 32 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $559 29 payments
  11. Other $4,604 257 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,153 821 payments
  2. Education $30 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,393 68 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,046 57 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $893 49 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $815 47 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $797 46 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $742 44 payments
  7. Livalo $570 31 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $502 28 payments
  9. TRULICITY $488 31 payments
  10. XARELTO $450 24 payments
  11. Other $12,158 660 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 126 drugs

Part D claims

5,709

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$658,236

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 128 $133,306
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 77 $62,593
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 45 $55,833
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 38 $49,733
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 54 $42,424
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 34 $41,541
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 48 $29,645
Prolia Denosumab Brand 15 $26,464
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 16 $23,968
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 22 $23,012

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 126 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$19,488

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

69

Average age 72

Services billed

253

35 women, 34 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 39%
Depression 30%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
COPD 23%
Osteoporosis 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $165
  • Lilly USA, LLC $97
$262 77 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $244
$244 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $121
$121 54 —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $112
$112 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $47
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $44
$91 22 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

824 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record