Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jorge Jimenez

Retina Specialist Baton Rouge, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1518353168 CMS profile 2786062

10202 Jefferson Hwy Ste D, Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,679

77 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jorge Jimenez of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,679 across 77 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 48th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $711 23
2024 General $583 27
2023 General $301 11
2022 General $458 7
2021 General $248 4
2019 General $379 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jorge Jimenez
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jorge Jimenez were reported at $711. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Jorge Jimenez Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $379 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $0 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $248 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $458 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $301 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $583 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $711 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $511 6 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $482 13 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $425 15 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $250 14 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $161 3 payments
  6. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $157 4 payments
  7. NotalVision $123 4 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $112 5 payments
  9. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $108 1 payment
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $104 4 payments
  11. Other $248 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,679 77 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VABYSMO $463 12 payments
  2. Izervay $404 14 payments
  3. Constellation $216 3 payments
  4. Centurion $173 2 payments
  5. EYLEA HD $161 3 payments
  6. Lucentis $136 2 payments
  7. Syfovre $135 3 payments
  8. Foresee Home $123 4 payments
  9. ReSTOR $122 1 payment
  10. OZURDEX $112 5 payments
  11. Other $669 34 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

1,000

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$30,241

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 374 $18,240
Difluprednate Generic 37 $3,614
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 156 $2,417
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 88 $1,170
Ofloxacin Generic 85 $975
Latanoprost Generic 67 $821
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 24 $812
Dorzolamide Hcl Generic 44 $700
Atropine Sulfate Generic 14 $460
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 36 $408

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,792,658

Of which drugs: $2,332,138

Medicare patients

815

Average age 75

Services billed

77,362

476 women, 339 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
COPD 18%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 228 66,480 $1,815,615
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 28 2,370 $276,484
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 44 160 $103,938
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 48 554 $70,735
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 21 35 $2,012
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 145 $111

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $112
$112 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $65
$65 — 66,480
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $48
$48 — —
XIPERE
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $37
$37 — —
VISUDYNE
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

77 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record