Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jonathan Berry

Family Medicine Little Rock, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1346731932 CMS profile 9442131

11415 Executive Center Dr, Little Rock, AR 72211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,847

592 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jonathan Berry of Little Rock, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,847 across 592 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,072 132
2024 General $2,209 150
2023 General $1,946 127
2022 General $2,202 155
2021 General $418 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jonathan Berry
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jonathan Berry were reported at $2,072. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Jonathan Berry Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $0 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $418 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,202 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,946 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,209 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,072 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,829 124 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $977 81 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $889 37 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $722 58 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $707 52 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $441 31 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $362 24 payments
  8. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $312 15 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $287 19 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $250 18 payments
  11. Other $2,070 133 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,827 591 payments
  2. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. QULIPTA $665 30 payments
  2. FARXIGA $624 20 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $604 55 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $583 43 payments
  5. UBRELVY $576 36 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $571 48 payments
  7. BREZTRI $458 10 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $376 31 payments
  9. ZAVZPRET $353 28 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $322 10 payments
  11. Other $7,013 480 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 133 drugs

Part D claims

7,404

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$540,874

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 98 $109,396
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 55 $60,006
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 39 $39,680
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 36 $39,097
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 52 $38,194
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 20 $25,792
Xultophy 100-3.6 Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Brand 26 $25,416
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 19 $18,828
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 23 $18,602
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 24 $17,977

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 133 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$90,474

Of which drugs: $15,193

Medicare patients

462

Average age 74

Services billed

2,603

248 women, 214 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 28%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 15 valent (pcv15), for intramuscular use 90671 Office 37 37 $9,194
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 52 52 $4,210
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 22 104 $75

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $149
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $31
$180 39 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $167
$167 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $154
$154 24 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $149
$149 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $135
$135 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

592 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record