Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Tauro

Neuromuscular Medicine Norwich, CT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1003915778 CMS profile 90984

1 Towne Park Plz, Norwich, CT 06360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$53,731

951 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Tauro of Norwich, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $53,731 across 951 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Neuromuscular Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,565 215
2024 General $6,218 168
2023 General $8,363 155
2022 General $6,687 126
2021 General $12,441 130
2020 General $14,723 105
2019 General $734 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Tauro
  • Neuromuscular Medicine median
  • Middle half of Neuromuscular Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Tauro were reported at $4,565. Among 188 Neuromuscular Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $530 and the middle half received between $134 and $6,440.

Show as a table
Year John Tauro Neuromuscular Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $734 $356 $114–$4,219 $163
2020 $14,723 $287 $72–$5,632 $114
2021 $12,441 $193 $73–$1,841 $132
2022 $6,687 $362 $109–$2,461 $149
2023 $8,363 $411 $119–$3,356 $160
2024 $6,218 $394 $122–$5,116 $164
2025 $4,565 $530 $134–$6,440 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $25,101 257 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $16,205 74 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,627 73 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $846 33 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $647 38 payments
  6. Lundbeck LLC $621 26 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $565 27 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $489 29 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $475 22 payments
  10. CSL Behring $436 22 payments
  11. Other $6,719 350 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $33,375 26 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $18,525 911 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,805 11 payments
  4. Education $26 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $22,503 156 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $13,671 39 payments
  3. QULIPTA $9,774 107 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT Pain $1,224 54 payments
  5. ZAVZPRET $1,152 51 payments
  6. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $1,064 55 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $744 37 payments
  8. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $657 41 payments
  9. VYEPTI $587 25 payments
  10. Rystiggo $529 17 payments
  11. Other $10,092 539 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

1,163

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,716,822

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

40.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vyvgart Efgartigimod Alfa-Fcab Brand 17 $1,070,663
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 93 $737,003
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 26 $446,717
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 30 $149,539
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 74 $115,287
Mestinon Pyridostigmine Bromide Brand 11 $43,666
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 32 $27,070
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 13 $26,901
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 13 $23,926
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 17 $16,107

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$131,086

Of which drugs: $80,382

Medicare patients

241

Average age 71

Services billed

32,840

145 women, 96 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 65%
Depression 40%
Diabetes 36%
COPD 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 25 18,000 $80,082
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 12 22 $45

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$2,946 13 —
BOTOX
$324 74 18,000
Rystiggo
$313 — —
NURTEC ODT
$257 13 —
ZAVZPRET
$257 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

951 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neuromuscular Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record