Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Stewart

Internal Medicine Mt Pleasant, SC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1447745831 CMS profile 5311513

180 Wingo Way Ste 207, Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,553

520 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Stewart of Mt Pleasant, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,553 across 520 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,723 89
2024 General $2,447 127
2023 General $2,111 121
2022 General $2,553 142
2021 General $721 41

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Stewart
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Stewart were reported at $1,723. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Stewart Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $721 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,553 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,111 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,447 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,723 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $996 71 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $979 54 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $603 37 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $603 35 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $586 32 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $439 19 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $430 25 payments
  8. Exact Sciences Corporation $374 19 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $342 18 payments
  10. Dexcom, Inc. $330 9 payments
  11. Other $3,872 201 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,527 518 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $15 1 payment
  3. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $707 39 payments
  2. ELIQUIS $485 25 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $472 36 payments
  4. XIFAXAN $430 25 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $403 24 payments
  6. Ozempic $386 23 payments
  7. FARXIGA $380 15 payments
  8. PAXLOVID $375 20 payments
  9. Cologuard Collection Kit $374 19 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $351 17 payments
  11. Other $8,651 466 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 123 drugs

Part D claims

6,516

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$676,144

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 104 $115,575
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 78 $84,965
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 71 $76,588
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 75 $68,784
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 42 $43,778
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 24 $36,192
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 42 $30,252
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 18 $22,825
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 27 $21,189
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 14 $21,027

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 123 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$135,017

Of which drugs: $29,606

Medicare patients

333

Average age 75

Services billed

3,300

141 women, 192 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Depression 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 11 960 $19,438
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 23 23 $6,672
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 30 30 $2,363
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 11 11 $943

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $226
$226 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $123
$123 71 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $116
$116 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $114
$114 42 —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $110
$110 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

520 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record