Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Sensenbrenner

Internal Medicine Charlotte, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1043297591 CMS profile 182941

8821 Blakeney Professional Dr, Charlotte, NC 28277

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,756

1,297 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$940

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$171,553 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, John Sensenbrenner of Charlotte, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,756 across 1,297 general payments and $940 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $171,553 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,234 168
2024 General $3,552 189
2023 General $3,272 182
2022 General $3,182 201
2021 General $3,349 212
2020 General $2,477 166
2019 General $2,689 179
2019 Research $940 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Sensenbrenner
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Sensenbrenner were reported at $3,234. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Sensenbrenner Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,689 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,477 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,349 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,182 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,272 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,552 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,234 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,130 142 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,073 140 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,788 99 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,658 90 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,154 62 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $1,016 42 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $961 59 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $932 57 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $742 53 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $648 41 payments
  11. Other $8,653 512 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,411 1,289 payments
  2. Education $345 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,050 72 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $996 64 payments
  3. FARXIGA $970 47 payments
  4. Kerendia $961 59 payments
  5. UBRELVY $829 59 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $671 42 payments
  7. XARELTO $648 41 payments
  8. PREVNAR 20 $624 27 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $609 38 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $555 36 payments
  11. Other $21,390 1,266 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $940 9 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 96 drugs

Part D claims

3,915

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$610,131

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $111,434
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 70 $86,088
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 79 $85,933
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 53 $54,947
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 47 $53,367
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 42 $53,118
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $43,340
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 21 $20,531
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 12 $13,594
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 17 $13,401

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 96 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,836

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

298

Average age 76

Services billed

1,155

147 women, 151 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 36%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
Depression 20%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Osteoporosis 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 47 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$269 — —
Auvelity
$221 — —
Veozah
$187 — —
QULIPTA
$163 — —
JARDIANCE
$163 47 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 47 with Patron

Records

1,306 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record