Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Paschold

Williamsburg, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1962407510 CMS profile 1308205

500 Sentara Circle, Suite 203, Williamsburg, VA 23188

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,063

18 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,700

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$867,222 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, John Paschold of Williamsburg, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,063 across 18 general payments and $5,700 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $867,222 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,628 4
2023 General $1,031 2
2022 General $1,952 1
2022 Research $5,700 9
2021 General $220 3
2020 General $1,171 4
2019 General $59 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Paschold
  • Virginia median
  • Middle half of Virginia
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Paschold were reported at $1,628. Among 24,845 Virginia profiles paid that year, the median was $179 and the middle half received between $56 and $613.

Show as a table
Year John Paschold Virginia median Middle half National median
2019 $59 $162 $50–$582 $163
2020 $1,171 $111 $36–$367 $114
2021 $220 $125 $37–$450 $132
2022 $1,952 $149 $45–$527 $149
2023 $1,031 $161 $50–$554 $160
2024 $0 $171 $55–$585 $164
2025 $1,628 $179 $56–$613 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,603 5 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $2,060 2 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,031 2 payments
  4. Array BioPharma Inc. $150 1 payment
  5. Incyte Corporation $100 1 payment
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $36 1 payment
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $21 1 payment
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $14 1 payment
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $13 1 payment
  10. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $12 1 payment
  11. Other $23 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $5,433 5 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $356 9 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $150 1 payment
  4. Education $123 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LIBTAYO $1,952 1 payment
  2. TAGRISSO $1,340 1 payment
  3. IMFINZI $1,110 1 payment
  4. BRAFTOVI $150 1 payment
  5. MEKTOVI $150 1 payment
  6. LORBRENA $150 1 payment
  7. SARCLISA $108 1 payment
  8. ENHERTU $36 1 payment
  9. SANDOSTATIN $21 1 payment
  10. VERZENIO $14 1 payment
  11. Other $79 6 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $5,700 9 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

385

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$1,911,996

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

56.9%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 48 $723,011
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 21 $479,388
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 11 $269,374
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 12 $197,081
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 12 $169,400
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 42 $39,618
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 61 $32,864
Dexamethasone Generic 35 $415
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 12 $235
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 12 $204

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 184 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,495,271

Of which drugs: $2,286,929

Medicare patients

622

Average age 74

Services billed

110,836

323 women, 299 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Cancer 47%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Heart failure 27%
COPD 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 28 19,900 $777,218
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 11 5,220 $204,755
Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use) J0881 Office 21 9,300 $21,540
Injection, pegfilgrastim, excludes biosimilar, 0.5 mg J2506 Office 12 216 $14,249
Injection, pemetrexed, 10 mg J9305 Office 11 2,490 $8,814
Injection, iron dextran, 50 mg J1750 Office 22 508 $7,004
Injection, filgrastim-aafi, biosimilar, (nivestym), 1 microgram Q5110 Office 12 7,380 $1,630
Injection, carboplatin, 50 mg J9045 Office 17 253 $670
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 21 5,700 $633
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 40 830 $590

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

27 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record