Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Koo

Psychiatry San Francisco, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1245289594 CMS profile 10603

515 Spruce St, San Francisco, CA 94118

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,991,924

2,603 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$11,920 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, John Koo of San Francisco, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,991,924 across 2,603 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $11,920 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Psychiatry profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $420,914 323
2024 General $420,869 410
2023 General $554,822 515
2022 General $511,908 438
2021 General $313,129 245
2020 General $223,063 188
2019 General $547,219 484

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Koo
  • Psychiatry median
  • Middle half of Psychiatry
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Koo were reported at $420,914. Among 14,155 Psychiatry profiles paid that year, the median was $180 and the middle half received between $58 and $685.

Show as a table
Year John Koo Psychiatry median Middle half National median
2019 $547,219 $184 $59–$605 $163
2020 $223,063 $119 $36–$372 $114
2021 $313,129 $143 $43–$576 $132
2022 $511,908 $153 $50–$590 $149
2023 $554,822 $170 $56–$651 $160
2024 $420,869 $179 $57–$673 $164
2025 $420,914 $180 $58–$685 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $569,949 547 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $424,661 358 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $294,247 226 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $238,298 164 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $210,363 123 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $200,852 212 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $181,348 159 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $131,654 99 payments
  9. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $118,604 100 payments
  10. Celgene Corporation $117,976 70 payments
  11. Other $503,971 545 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,217,766 762 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $337,816 753 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $190,785 73 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $92,240 9 payments
  5. Honoraria $83,905 24 payments
  6. Food and Beverage $62,096 961 payments
  7. Education $4,516 20 payments
  8. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $2,800 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla $287,302 212 payments
  2. TALTZ $269,639 221 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $245,165 217 payments
  4. ILUMYA $238,109 161 payments
  5. TREMFYA $198,598 169 payments
  6. CIBINQO $193,981 108 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Immunology $168,679 110 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $158,892 190 payments
  9. RINVOQ $132,776 93 payments
  10. EBGLYSS $126,593 94 payments
  11. Other $837,596 748 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

39

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$3,437

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 24 $2,426
Pimozide Generic 15 $1,011

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$9,881

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

35

Average age 74

Services billed

144

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 31%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$63,956 — —
CIBINQO
$44,816 — —
Otezla
$44,119 — —
DUPIXENT
$41,774 — —
SOTYKTU
$41,314 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

2,603 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Psychiatry in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record