Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Kim

Internal Medicine Annandale, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1053472159 CMS profile 228905

7700 Little River Tpke Ste 102, Annandale, VA 22003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,371

499 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Kim of Annandale, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,371 across 499 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,331 60
2024 General $1,745 85
2023 General $1,579 79
2022 General $1,243 65
2021 General $1,702 93
2020 General $1,188 78
2019 General $582 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Kim
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Kim were reported at $1,331. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Kim Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $582 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,188 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,702 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,243 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,579 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,745 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,331 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $849 48 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $725 38 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $618 24 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $594 33 payments
  5. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $513 28 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $473 29 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $469 26 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $414 28 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $407 23 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $355 18 payments
  11. Other $3,953 204 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,101 492 payments
  2. Education $270 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $685 35 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $649 33 payments
  3. ZTLido $513 28 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $473 29 payments
  5. XARELTO $407 23 payments
  6. GEMTESA $342 25 payments
  7. Kerendia $331 16 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $321 22 payments
  9. FARXIGA $296 17 payments
  10. Otezla $272 12 payments
  11. Other $7,249 397 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 258 drugs

Part D claims

34,358

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,920,075

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 681 $406,703
Lidocaine Generic 1,576 $372,339
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 312 $360,545
Prolia Denosumab Brand 184 $319,171
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 211 $318,714
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 400 $296,815
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 322 $252,778
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 175 $242,177
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 160 $212,783
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 128 $195,750

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 258 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$629,283

Of which drugs: $9,221

Medicare patients

812

Average age 78

Services billed

11,119

526 women, 286 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 41%
Osteoporosis 29%
Alzheimer's or dementia 24%
Depression 20%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 100 100 $8,090
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 183 752 $727
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 17 17 $372
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 64 $6

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $210
$210 312 —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $177
$177 90 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $97
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $41
$138 211 —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $66
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $20
$86 14 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $82
$82 160 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

499 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record