Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Ironside

Neurology Little Rock, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1891727855 CMS profile 40679

10001 Lile Dr, Little Rock, AR 72205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,673

430 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Ironside of Little Rock, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,673 across 430 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,764 103
2024 General $2,005 107
2023 General $1,468 86
2022 General $645 42
2021 General $534 28
2020 General $406 13
2019 General $2,851 51

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Ironside
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Ironside were reported at $1,764. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year John Ironside Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,851 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $406 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $534 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $645 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,468 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $2,005 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,764 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,052 194 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $2,287 6 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,073 60 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $654 44 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $366 23 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $340 14 payments
  7. Lundbeck LLC $280 6 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $169 12 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $166 8 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $161 9 payments
  11. Other $1,125 54 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,404 426 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,100 1 payment
  3. Education $124 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $46 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ajovy $2,163 4 payments
  2. UBRELVY $1,596 101 payments
  3. QULIPTA $1,424 102 payments
  4. KESIMPTA $938 51 payments
  5. BOTOX $819 41 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $629 43 payments
  7. ZAVZPRET $273 22 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT Pain $264 21 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $239 13 payments
  10. VYEPTI $219 3 payments
  11. Other $2,627 133 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

3,228

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,087,466

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

29.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 39 $326,819
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 21 $200,499
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 56 $109,021
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 12 $93,204
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 11 $64,115
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 45 $63,117
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 41 $58,589
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 27 $43,322
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 13 $34,798
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 15 $15,143

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$331,895

Of which drugs: $181,390

Medicare patients

675

Average age 75

Services billed

18,275

391 women, 284 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Diabetes 32%
Depression 27%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 18 9,255 $44,175
Injection, gadoteridol, (prohance multipack), per ml A9576 Office 34 537 $625

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KESIMPTA
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $412
$412 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $331
$331 45 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $278
$278 — 9,255
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $278
$278 27 —
KISUNLA
  • Lilly USA, LLC $108
$108 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

430 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record