Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Irons

Interventional Pain Medicine Vestavia, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1578822904 CMS profile 2781854

2868 Acton Rd, Vestavia, AL 35243

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,647

595 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Irons of Vestavia, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,647 across 595 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,212 113
2024 General $2,089 69
2023 General $4,611 99
2022 General $1,568 72
2021 General $2,234 60
2020 General $1,352 52
2019 General $5,582 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Irons
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Irons were reported at $4,212. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year John Irons Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,582 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $1,352 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $2,234 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $1,568 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $4,611 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $2,089 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $4,212 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $4,849 63 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $3,195 60 payments
  3. Medtronic USA, Inc. $1,979 32 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $1,755 85 payments
  5. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $1,435 22 payments
  6. Bioventus LLC $1,414 5 payments
  7. MML US, Inc. $1,217 19 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $857 47 payments
  9. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $579 37 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $529 36 payments
  11. Other $3,838 189 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,778 578 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $3,851 16 payments
  3. Education $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $2,982 31 payments
  2. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $2,110 36 payments
  3. INTELLIS $1,898 30 payments
  4. Omnia $1,501 23 payments
  5. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $1,435 22 payments
  6. Stimrouter Implantable Kit $1,414 5 payments
  7. ReActiv8 $1,217 19 payments
  8. PROCLAIM $977 45 payments
  9. SYNCHROMEDII $724 14 payments
  10. XTAMPZA $500 31 payments
  11. Other $7,230 367 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

22,493

Median for Anesthesiology: 322

Drug cost

$1,062,709

Median for Anesthesiology: $8,738

Branded share of claims

49%

Median for Anesthesiology: 25.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 6,249 $137,459
Buprenorphine Generic 418 $104,479
Lidocaine Generic 410 $95,202
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 147 $94,545
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 3,391 $87,316
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 75 $75,130
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 103 $59,217
Gabapentin Generic 3,357 $52,586
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 37 $49,881
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 257 $39,988

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,517 Part D prescribers listed as Anesthesiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$353,962

Of which drugs: $3,639

Medicare patients

571

Average age 69

Services billed

6,670

342 women, 229 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 41%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
COPD 28%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 99 462 $2,417
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 30 2,000 $205
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 66 940 $77
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 92 264 $27

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $196
$196 103 —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $113
$113 37 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $76
$76 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $56
$56 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $47
$47 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

595 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record