Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Erwin

Family Medicine Hot Springs, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1518906858 CMS profile 577232

1629 Airport Rd, Suite B, Hot Springs, AR 71913

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,415

598 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Erwin of Hot Springs, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,415 across 598 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,666 74
2024 General $1,458 71
2023 General $1,957 92
2022 General $2,008 103
2021 General $2,123 100
2020 General $1,639 87
2019 General $1,564 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Erwin
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Erwin were reported at $1,666. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year John Erwin Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,564 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,639 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,123 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,008 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,957 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,458 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,666 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,734 110 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,087 39 payments
  3. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $940 36 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $869 54 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $825 38 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $694 31 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $538 25 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $530 10 payments
  9. Antares Pharma, Inc. $518 31 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $402 24 payments
  11. Other $4,276 200 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,315 597 payments
  2. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $829 29 payments
  2. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $791 54 payments
  3. REXULTI $768 34 payments
  4. UBRELVY $663 32 payments
  5. KRYSTEXXA $422 15 payments
  6. QULIPTA $412 21 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $359 21 payments
  8. XYOSTED $351 22 payments
  9. FreeStyle Libre 3 $310 19 payments
  10. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $290 18 payments
  11. Other $10,117 528 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 188 drugs

Part D claims

10,896

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$772,763

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

35%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 78 $83,809
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $51,877
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 73 $46,943
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 28 $40,152
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 61 $38,058
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 35 $28,815
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 24 $28,412
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,203 $28,112
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 12 $26,652
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 18 $25,805

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 188 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 181 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$264,012

Of which drugs: $4,853

Medicare patients

886

Average age 75

Services billed

41,920

458 women, 428 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Ischemic heart disease 45%
Depression 39%
Diabetes 30%
Heart failure 29%
Atrial fibrillation 29%
COPD 28%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 35 35 $2,824
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 13 35,050 $564
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 90 $51
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 24 120 $33
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 14 32 $25
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 37 172 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $205
$205 18 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $156
$156 35 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $140
$140 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $104
$104 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $80
$80 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

598 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record