Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Calado

Internal Medicine Troy, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1972567113 CMS profile 225492

1639 E Big Beaver Rd Ste 202, Troy, MI 48083

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$197,645

699 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Calado of Troy, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $197,645 across 699 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $46,958 131
2024 General $27,859 88
2023 General $77,449 163
2022 General $42,102 113
2021 General $1,362 82
2020 General $1,070 80
2019 General $847 42

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Calado
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Calado were reported at $46,958. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year John Calado Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $847 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,070 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,362 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $42,102 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $77,449 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $27,859 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $46,958 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $160,280 226 payments
  2. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $29,501 51 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,093 61 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $974 44 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $637 40 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $564 35 payments
  7. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $439 30 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $421 25 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $380 11 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $342 20 payments
  11. Other $3,014 156 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $140,300 79 payments
  2. Honoraria $25,425 9 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $15,572 60 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $14,248 549 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $2,000 1 payment
  6. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $143,550 185 payments
  2. Auvelity $29,417 47 payments
  3. REPATHA Cardiovascular $16,364 26 payments
  4. BREZTRI $709 32 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $487 28 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $444 23 payments
  7. NUEDEXTA $439 30 payments
  8. UBRELVY $365 20 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $362 23 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $351 21 payments
  11. Other $7,650 412 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 106 drugs

Part D claims

5,081

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,084,423

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

32.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 446 $344,028
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 145 $151,600
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 90 $85,671
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 59 $75,503
Auvelity Dextromethorphan Hbr/Bupropion Brand 48 $61,280
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 33 $45,661
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 34 $31,391
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 15 $23,984
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 34 $22,546
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 27 $22,522

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 106 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$70,815

Of which drugs: $36

Medicare patients

104

Average age 75

Services billed

1,050

56 women, 48 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 68%
Ischemic heart disease 55%
Diabetes 29%
COPD 27%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 20 41 $3

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $26,153
$26,153 446 —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $243
$243 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $209
$209 16 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $184
$184 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $147
$147 33 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

699 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record